Friday, March 20, 2015

Negativity 2.0

Pop quiz: What social app has gone viral on college campuses across America where people within close proximately of each other can now anonymously share their thoughts?

Read On:
Answer: Yik Yak. 

Created in 2013 by two Furman students, you can download the app for free and then anonymously start bashing.  Correct, bashing! 

I first became aware of Yik Yak thanks to my social savvy friend Scott Anderson, an Executive Chef at Shepherd University.  He was monitoring feedback known as yaks about the food he was serving.  Across the country, in Yik Yak’s short history, numerous professors and students have been abused via posts with crude, demeaning and sometimes sexually explicit language.  Offensive racial and ethnic posts are common.  In one case at a major Midwestern institution, there was even a threat of mass violence. 

My query this morning: Why are the majority of Yik Yak’s posts negative?  Could it be that comments are posted anonymously or a result that everyone now has a voice thanks to social media.  Negatively 2.0 is predominant.  And remember, Yik Yak is mainly popular on college campuses, which are grooming our future leaders, work force.  If a majority of their commentary is negative, what will their commentary be like in five years?

“We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we build our youth for the future.”  Franklin D. Roosevelt

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

The Big Black Hole

This past weekend I read an interesting interview with Lew Cirne, the Chief Data Nerd (Lew’s Twitter title) at New Relic, a software analytics company based in San Francisco.  The comment that piqued my interest was when Lew indicated that big meetings make you lose focus. 

Read On:
Candidly, I believe that meetings are the Big Black Hole in Corporate America, a concept I introduced in my first blog post back in 2008 titled Outsourcing Makes $en$e.  In my post, I shared the survey findings of the top time wasters among executives.  The amount of time they wasted in meetings was one of their leading responses. 

Lew in his comments did not address the time factor of meetings.  Instead he talked about the size factor where he observes people feel less willing to share/volunteer contributions in big meetings, especially in the presence of senior management.  Lew believes big meetings become more about receiving information than people actually being part of the dialogue.  Consequently, he has a table in his office with six seats in order to avoid big meetings.  He also reviews his quarterly calendar to question the validity/focus of each meeting scheduled.

Don’t get me wrong.  I think meetings are still relevant to keep the flow of communication and tasks moving in an organization.  However, as more companies embrace Social Enterprise and empower/train their people to become “knowledge workers” in the collaborative world of Web 2.0, something has to give in the time management equation.  I recommend the Big Black Hole is the first place to conduct a time management analysis.  

Stay focused!  Avoid the Big Black Hole.